State v. Reidel
This text of 15 N.W.2d 161 (State v. Reidel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case of State v. Potokar, ante, p. 460, 15 N. W. (2d) 158, and this case were argued together. In the Potokar Case the defendant attacked the constitutionality of sec. 66.05 (10) (hm), Stats., which fixes closing hours of Class B malt-beverage licensed premises, and in this case the defendant Reidel attacks the constitutionality of sec. 176.06, fixing closing hours of Class B intoxicating-liquor licensed premises.
The questions involved in this case were fully considered and determined in the case of State v. Potokar. For the reasons stated in that case the order sustaining the demurrer must be reversed.
By the Court. — Order sustaining the demurrer is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.W.2d 161, 245 Wis. 467, 1944 Wisc. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reidel-wis-1944.