State v. Reid

542 So. 2d 453, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1080, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2301, 1989 WL 43331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 1989·No. No. 88-510·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order of the trial court granting Everald Montgomery Reid’s motion to dismiss the information charging Reid with, inter alia, carrying a concealed firearm. There exists a genuine issue of material fact concerning the extent to which the firearm in question was concealed by Reid’s shirt. “[A] completely revealed weapon would not be a concealed weapon, and dismissal on motion would be proper. But it does not follow that a weapon, in order to be concealed, must be completely concealed.” State v. Sellers, 281 So.2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); see also State v. Joseph, 506 So.2d 493 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). The weapon could have been concealed; it is for the jury to determine whether it was concealed. Joseph, 506 So.2d at 494. We need not reach the state's remaining point on appeal concerning the sufficiency of the jurat.

The order of dismissal is quashed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Order quashed; remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Reid, 542 So. 2d 453, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1080, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2301, 1989 WL 43331 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

542 So. 2d 453 (State v. Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Presume
710 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Rosenberg
648 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Session v. State
568 So. 2d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)