State v. . Register

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Register

29 S.E.2d 464, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 323

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 22, 1944·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendants were indicted for conspiracy to commit a felonious assault upon tbe State’s witness, and also for assault upon him with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. There was a general verdict of guilty. While the evidence was conflicting, the jury .has accepted the State’s version of'the transaction. An examination of the record reveals no error in the trial. The exception to evidence of a declaration by one of the defendants cannot be sustained. This evidence was competent and there was no request that its effect be limited. S. v. McKeithan, 203 N. C., 494, 166 S. E., 336. The exceptions to the charge are without merit. The judgment pronounced upon the verdict will not be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendants were indicted for conspiracy to commit a felonious assault upon tbe State’s witness, and also for assault upon him with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. There was a general verdict of guilty. While the evidence was conflicting, the jury .has accepted the State’s version of'the transaction. An examination of the record reveals no error in the trial. The exception to evidence of a declaration by one of the defendants cannot be sustained. This evidence was competent and there was no request that its effect be limited. S. v. McKeithan, 203 N. C., 494, 166 S. E., 336. The exceptions to the charge are without merit. The judgment pronounced upon the verdict will not be disturbed.

No error.

State v. . Register, 29 S.E.2d 464, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 323 (N.C. 1944).

Pincite

29 S.E.2d 464 (State v. . Register) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related