State v. . Register

29 S.E.2d 464, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 323
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 22, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 S.E.2d 464 (State v. . Register) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Register, 29 S.E.2d 464, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 323 (N.C. 1944).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe defendants were indicted for conspiracy to commit a felonious assault upon tbe State’s witness, and also for assault upon him with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. There was a general verdict of guilty. While the evidence was conflicting, the jury .has accepted the State’s version of'the transaction. An examination of the record reveals no error in the trial. The exception to evidence of a declaration by one of the defendants cannot be sustained. This evidence was competent and there was no request that its effect be limited. S. v. McKeithan, 203 N. C., 494, 166 S. E., 336. The exceptions to the charge are without merit. The judgment pronounced upon the verdict will not be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cephus
86 S.E.2d 70 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
State v. Summerlin
60 S.E.2d 322 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
State v. . Cogdale
40 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E.2d 464, 224 N.C. 854, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-register-nc-1944.