State v. Reeves

217 P.3d 1158
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 2009
Docket81780-4
StatusPublished

This text of 217 P.3d 1158 (State v. Reeves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Reeves, 217 P.3d 1158 (Wash. 2009).

Opinion

217 P.3d 1158 (2009)
166 Wash.2d 1024

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jon Curtis REEVES, Petitioner.

No. 81780-4.

Supreme Court of Washington.

September 9, 2009.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its September 8, 2009, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals, Division One, for reconsideration in *1159 light of State v. Sutherby, 165 Wash.2d 870, 204 P.3d 916 (2009)

For the Court

/s/ Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sutherby
204 P.3d 916 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)
State v. Sutherby
165 Wash. 2d 870 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 P.3d 1158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reeves-wash-2009.