State v. Reese
This text of 565 S.W.3d 766 (State v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Calvin Reese ("Defendant") appeals the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree domestic assault, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain testimony into evidence. Finding that Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion or that Defendant was prejudiced as a result, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
565 S.W.3d 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reese-moctapp-2019.