State v. Reese

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Reese

565 S.W.3d 766

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2019·No. No. ED 105837·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Calvin Reese ("Defendant") appeals the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree domestic assault, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain testimony into evidence. Finding that Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion or that Defendant was prejudiced as a result, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Calvin Reese ("Defendant") appeals the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree domestic assault, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain testimony into evidence. Finding that Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion or that Defendant was prejudiced as a result, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Reese, 565 S.W.3d 766 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

565 S.W.3d 766 (State v. Reese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.