State v. Reefer King Co., Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

State v. Reefer King Co., Inc.

562 P.2d 702, 1977 Alas. LEXIS 488

CourtAlaska Supreme Court

DecidedApril 13, 1977

Docket2605-2607

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 562 P.2d 702 (State v. Reefer King Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alaska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reefer King Co., Inc., 562 P.2d 702, 1977 Alas. LEXIS 488 (Ala. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

BURKE, Justice.

Appellee Reefer King Company, Inc., filed a petition for rehearing after our decision was rendered in State of Alaska et al. v. Reefer King Company, Inc., 559 P.2d 56 (Alaska 1976). We are persuaded by the petition to modify our earlier holding in one respect, upon the ground that we have overlooked or misconceived a material fact. Rule 27(a)(2), Alaska R.App.P.

The record supports petitioner’s contention that the M/V REEFER KING processed crab exclusively at Kodiak from 1965 through April 21, 1967. The only movement of the vessel during that period of time was to and from the State of Washington for drydocking and repairs. Such movement, under our decision, would not destroy the processor’s shore based status.

Accordingly, our earlier opinion is modified to reflect that Reefer King Company, Inc. is due $37,881.10, plus interest, for excess taxes paid on its operations from 1964 to July 1, 1966.

We find the other points raised by the petition to be without merit. As to those points, the petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI