State v. Reed

162 P.3d 379, 214 Or. App. 164, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 978
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 11, 2007·No. F10857; A127684·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for attempted first-degree rape, ORS 163.375, first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. On appeal, he raises numerous challenges to his convictions, which we reject without discussion. Defendant further contends that the trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine of $20,000 to pay for future psychological treatment for the victim. Defendant asserts that no evidence was presented to support such a fine. The state concedes that, under State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 995 P2d 1202 (2000), such fines cannot be imposed in the absence of evidence that the victim has actually suffered a pecuniary loss and that there was no such evidence here. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and, consequently, accept it.

Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Reed, 162 P.3d 379, 214 Or. App. 164, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 978 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

162 P.3d 379 (State v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Donahue
995 P.2d 1202 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)