State v. Reed

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Reed

373 A.2d 1211, 173 Conn. 759

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 7, 1977·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo [760] motu, that unless the state files its brief on or before July 1, 1977, the judgment be set aside and the ease be remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendant.

William F. Gallagher, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Victor P. F-asano, for the appellant (defendant). Argued June 7 decided June 7, 1977

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo [760] motu, that unless the state files its brief on or before July 1, 1977, the judgment be set aside and the ease be remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendant.

William F. Gallagher, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Victor P. F-asano, for the appellant (defendant). Argued June 7 decided June 7, 1977

State v. Reed, 373 A.2d 1211, 173 Conn. 759 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

373 A.2d 1211 (State v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.