State v. Reece

484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 2016 WL 1211364
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 29, 2016
DocketWD 78529
StatusPublished

This text of 484 S.W.3d 893 (State v. Reece) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Reece, 484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 2016 WL 1211364 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam ’

Jerry Reece appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of driving while intoxicated. Reece argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction insofar as, the evidence failed to establish a. temporal. connection between his: intoxication and his driving. Finding no error of law, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 2016 WL 1211364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reece-moctapp-2016.