State v. Redtomahawk

2018 ND 74, 908 N.W.2d 697
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 22, 2018
Docket20170353
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 ND 74 (State v. Redtomahawk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Redtomahawk, 2018 ND 74, 908 N.W.2d 697 (N.D. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Kellen Everad Redtomahawk appealed a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery, a class B felony. On appeal, Redtomahawk argues the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 ND 74, 908 N.W.2d 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-redtomahawk-nd-2018.