[Cite as State v. Redmond, 2025-Ohio-313.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY
State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-23-063
Appellee Trial Court No. 2023 CR 0103
v.
Christina Marie Redmond DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant Decided: January 31, 2025
*****
Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Misty Wood, for appellant.
SULEK, P.J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Christina Redmond, appeals the December 5, 2023 judgment of
the Wood County Court of Common Pleas which, following a jury trial finding her guilty
of endangering children, sentenced her to community control. Because the conviction is
supported by sufficient evidence, it is affirmed. I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} On February 25, 2023, Redmond took her eight-week-old son, Js.H., to
Wood County Hospital’s emergency room. Medical personnel diagnosed him with a
broken femur and rib and transferred him to Toledo Children’s Hospital for treatment.
After repeated requests by children services and police, on February 27, Redmond
brought Js.H.’s twin, Ja.H., to Wood County Hospital for evaluation. Medical personnel
diagnosed her with a skull fracture and transported her to Toledo Children’s Hospital.
{¶ 3} On March 16, 2023, the Wood County Grand Jury indicted Redmond on two
third-degree felony counts of endangering children, R.C. 2919.22(A) and
2919.22(E)(2)(c). Redmond pleaded not guilty to the charges.
{¶ 4} The case proceeded to trial on October 23, 2023. Reviewing the children’s
medical records, their pediatrician, Dr. Mike Lemon, testified that the twins were born
prematurely at the end of December, 2022. After a NICU stay, they were discharged in
early February. Both children were seen at his office on February 6, 2023; Dr. Lemon
noted no broken bones or abnormalities. Dr. Lemon testified that on February 24, 2023,
a home healthcare nurse visited the twins. Discharging them from home healthcare, the
nurse’s notes indicated that they were meeting development goals.
{¶ 5} Dr. Lemon testified that failure to promptly treat a bone fracture can cause
bleeding, infection, and improper healing. Risks of an untreated skull fracture include
pressure and bleeding in the cranial cavity. Dr. Lemon agreed that bone fractures are
often confirmed by x-rays, not visual observation alone.
2. {¶ 6} North Baltimore Police Officer Andrew Burmeister testified that on
February 25, 2023, he responded to a call of an infant with suspicious injuries at Wood
County Hospital. Officer Burmeister observed the x-ray of Js.H.’s broken femur. Officer
Burmeister followed the ambulance transporting Js.H. to Toledo Hospital. Upon arrival,
he met with a Wood County Job and Family Services (WCJFS) caseworker and an
investigator with the Wood County Prosecutor’s office.
{¶ 7} Officer Burmeister testified that North Baltimore Police dispatched an
officer to Redmond’s home to conduct a welfare check on the remaining children. Later,
Officer Burmeister accompanied WCJFS to the home to implement their safety plan.
Burmeister stated that he observed Ja.H. sitting, unrestrained on the couch, with an older
sibling who played video games.
{¶ 8} Continuing his investigation, Officer Burmeister obtained a search warrant
gaining access to Redmond’s and the twins’ father’s phones. Police gave the extracted
data to the prosecutor’s office.
{¶ 9} North Baltimore Police Officer Tyler Nagy testified that on February 25,
2023, he conducted a welfare check at Redmond’s home. Officer Nagy stated that the
small, two-bedroom trailer was messy, there were multiple highchairs extending into the
living area and toys and blankets covering the floor. Officer Nagy observed Ja.H. who
appeared to be sleeping and not in distress.
{¶ 10} Redmond’s daughter, A.G., testified that she is 17 and currently in foster
care. A.G. testified that in February 2023, her mom left Ja.H. alone in the back bedroom
3. to make bottles. Her three-year old sister ran into the room and they heard a thud. A.G.
observed the three-year old on the bed and Ja.H. on the floor crying. A.G. testified that
the three-year old was jealous of the twins.
{¶ 11} Brynn Burr, an investigator with the Wood County Prosecutor’s office,
testified her involvement in the case began on February 25, 2023, following a call from
WCJFS. She met with the twins’ parents at Toledo Children’s Hospital.
{¶ 12} Burr testified that Redmond denied knowledge of what caused Js.H.’s
injuries. Redmond stated that when she worked, her boyfriend, Jason, the twins’ father,
helped care for the children. Burr testified to the following timeline of the relevant
events as relayed by Redmond and evidenced in her cell records. On the morning of
February 23, 2023, Jason left for a short trip. The visiting nurse texted to set up a visit
the following day to discharge the twins from the program. On February 24, Redmond
noticed something wrong with Js.H.’s leg; she texted coworkers in a group chat asking if
anyone could cover her work shift. She also texted and called Jason regarding Js.H.’s
leg. Redmond agreed to seek medical care for Js.H.
{¶ 13} Jason texted asking if Js.H. had seen the doctor; Redmond stated that she
took him to urgent care. She texted co-workers again complaining that it was the worst
day of her life, that the twins’ father was leaving her, that there was something wrong
with her baby’s leg, and that her toddler pushed or threw Ja.H. off the bed.
4. {¶ 14} Jason returned the evening of Friday, February 24. They decided to take
Js.H. to the hospital if his leg did not improve. Burr’s investigation began at 11:00 a.m.
the next morning after receiving a call from the hospital.
{¶ 15} Burr testified that following Js.H.’s hospitalization, WCJFS implemented a
safety plan preventing Redmond or Jason from being alone with any of the children.
WCJFS also conducted a home site and safety check.
{¶ 16} On Saturday, February 25, Burr told Redmond to take Js.H.’s twin sister,
Ja.H., to the emergency room for an evaluation. After WCJFS again told Redmond she
needed to take Ja.H. to the emergency room, on Monday, February 27, she was evaluated
and diagnosed with a skull fracture and then transported to Toledo Children’s Hospital.
{¶ 17} Burr questioned Redmond about the injury; she failed to inform Burr that
Ja.H.’s sister pushed her off the bed. Burr acknowledged that Ja.H. had no observable
injuries and there were no reports of the child being in distress.
{¶ 18} Dr. Kayleene Pagan Correa, an emergency room physician at Toledo
Children’s Hospital, testified that she treated the children’s injuries as described in the
medical records. The State admitted the exhibits and rested its case.
{¶ 19} Redmond moved for a directed verdict on both child endangering counts.
Redmond contended that the State failed to prove that she recklessly failed to seek
medical treatment for her children because she lacked knowledge of the extent or
existence of their injuries. The court overruled the motion.
5. {¶ 20} Redmond then presented her case. Her son, A.G., testified that in February
2023, he lived in the trailer with his mother, uncle, and siblings. A.G. stated that his
mom was very gentle with the twins and constantly worried about their health. A.G.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
[Cite as State v. Redmond, 2025-Ohio-313.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY
State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-23-063
Appellee Trial Court No. 2023 CR 0103
v.
Christina Marie Redmond DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant Decided: January 31, 2025
*****
Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Misty Wood, for appellant.
SULEK, P.J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Christina Redmond, appeals the December 5, 2023 judgment of
the Wood County Court of Common Pleas which, following a jury trial finding her guilty
of endangering children, sentenced her to community control. Because the conviction is
supported by sufficient evidence, it is affirmed. I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} On February 25, 2023, Redmond took her eight-week-old son, Js.H., to
Wood County Hospital’s emergency room. Medical personnel diagnosed him with a
broken femur and rib and transferred him to Toledo Children’s Hospital for treatment.
After repeated requests by children services and police, on February 27, Redmond
brought Js.H.’s twin, Ja.H., to Wood County Hospital for evaluation. Medical personnel
diagnosed her with a skull fracture and transported her to Toledo Children’s Hospital.
{¶ 3} On March 16, 2023, the Wood County Grand Jury indicted Redmond on two
third-degree felony counts of endangering children, R.C. 2919.22(A) and
2919.22(E)(2)(c). Redmond pleaded not guilty to the charges.
{¶ 4} The case proceeded to trial on October 23, 2023. Reviewing the children’s
medical records, their pediatrician, Dr. Mike Lemon, testified that the twins were born
prematurely at the end of December, 2022. After a NICU stay, they were discharged in
early February. Both children were seen at his office on February 6, 2023; Dr. Lemon
noted no broken bones or abnormalities. Dr. Lemon testified that on February 24, 2023,
a home healthcare nurse visited the twins. Discharging them from home healthcare, the
nurse’s notes indicated that they were meeting development goals.
{¶ 5} Dr. Lemon testified that failure to promptly treat a bone fracture can cause
bleeding, infection, and improper healing. Risks of an untreated skull fracture include
pressure and bleeding in the cranial cavity. Dr. Lemon agreed that bone fractures are
often confirmed by x-rays, not visual observation alone.
2. {¶ 6} North Baltimore Police Officer Andrew Burmeister testified that on
February 25, 2023, he responded to a call of an infant with suspicious injuries at Wood
County Hospital. Officer Burmeister observed the x-ray of Js.H.’s broken femur. Officer
Burmeister followed the ambulance transporting Js.H. to Toledo Hospital. Upon arrival,
he met with a Wood County Job and Family Services (WCJFS) caseworker and an
investigator with the Wood County Prosecutor’s office.
{¶ 7} Officer Burmeister testified that North Baltimore Police dispatched an
officer to Redmond’s home to conduct a welfare check on the remaining children. Later,
Officer Burmeister accompanied WCJFS to the home to implement their safety plan.
Burmeister stated that he observed Ja.H. sitting, unrestrained on the couch, with an older
sibling who played video games.
{¶ 8} Continuing his investigation, Officer Burmeister obtained a search warrant
gaining access to Redmond’s and the twins’ father’s phones. Police gave the extracted
data to the prosecutor’s office.
{¶ 9} North Baltimore Police Officer Tyler Nagy testified that on February 25,
2023, he conducted a welfare check at Redmond’s home. Officer Nagy stated that the
small, two-bedroom trailer was messy, there were multiple highchairs extending into the
living area and toys and blankets covering the floor. Officer Nagy observed Ja.H. who
appeared to be sleeping and not in distress.
{¶ 10} Redmond’s daughter, A.G., testified that she is 17 and currently in foster
care. A.G. testified that in February 2023, her mom left Ja.H. alone in the back bedroom
3. to make bottles. Her three-year old sister ran into the room and they heard a thud. A.G.
observed the three-year old on the bed and Ja.H. on the floor crying. A.G. testified that
the three-year old was jealous of the twins.
{¶ 11} Brynn Burr, an investigator with the Wood County Prosecutor’s office,
testified her involvement in the case began on February 25, 2023, following a call from
WCJFS. She met with the twins’ parents at Toledo Children’s Hospital.
{¶ 12} Burr testified that Redmond denied knowledge of what caused Js.H.’s
injuries. Redmond stated that when she worked, her boyfriend, Jason, the twins’ father,
helped care for the children. Burr testified to the following timeline of the relevant
events as relayed by Redmond and evidenced in her cell records. On the morning of
February 23, 2023, Jason left for a short trip. The visiting nurse texted to set up a visit
the following day to discharge the twins from the program. On February 24, Redmond
noticed something wrong with Js.H.’s leg; she texted coworkers in a group chat asking if
anyone could cover her work shift. She also texted and called Jason regarding Js.H.’s
leg. Redmond agreed to seek medical care for Js.H.
{¶ 13} Jason texted asking if Js.H. had seen the doctor; Redmond stated that she
took him to urgent care. She texted co-workers again complaining that it was the worst
day of her life, that the twins’ father was leaving her, that there was something wrong
with her baby’s leg, and that her toddler pushed or threw Ja.H. off the bed.
4. {¶ 14} Jason returned the evening of Friday, February 24. They decided to take
Js.H. to the hospital if his leg did not improve. Burr’s investigation began at 11:00 a.m.
the next morning after receiving a call from the hospital.
{¶ 15} Burr testified that following Js.H.’s hospitalization, WCJFS implemented a
safety plan preventing Redmond or Jason from being alone with any of the children.
WCJFS also conducted a home site and safety check.
{¶ 16} On Saturday, February 25, Burr told Redmond to take Js.H.’s twin sister,
Ja.H., to the emergency room for an evaluation. After WCJFS again told Redmond she
needed to take Ja.H. to the emergency room, on Monday, February 27, she was evaluated
and diagnosed with a skull fracture and then transported to Toledo Children’s Hospital.
{¶ 17} Burr questioned Redmond about the injury; she failed to inform Burr that
Ja.H.’s sister pushed her off the bed. Burr acknowledged that Ja.H. had no observable
injuries and there were no reports of the child being in distress.
{¶ 18} Dr. Kayleene Pagan Correa, an emergency room physician at Toledo
Children’s Hospital, testified that she treated the children’s injuries as described in the
medical records. The State admitted the exhibits and rested its case.
{¶ 19} Redmond moved for a directed verdict on both child endangering counts.
Redmond contended that the State failed to prove that she recklessly failed to seek
medical treatment for her children because she lacked knowledge of the extent or
existence of their injuries. The court overruled the motion.
5. {¶ 20} Redmond then presented her case. Her son, A.G., testified that in February
2023, he lived in the trailer with his mother, uncle, and siblings. A.G. stated that his
mom was very gentle with the twins and constantly worried about their health. A.G.
stated that Redmond never physically disciplined her children. A.G. never observed any
injuries on the twins or observed them in distress. A.G. stated that the mark on Js.H.’s
leg looked like a bug bite and that when they manipulated it, he showed no discomfort.
{¶ 21} Redmond’s brother, William Atkins, testified that Redmond, her boyfriend,
and her children lived in his trailer. Atkins worked third shift and slept at the trailer
during the day. He testified that Redmond cared for the children unless she was working
and then Jason would watch them. Atkins stated that Redmond did not physically
discipline the children.
{¶ 22} A.R., Redmond’s daughter, testified that her mom was good with the twins.
She stated that Redmond worked a lot and provided for her children. When she was at
work, Jason watched the children. She and her sister would also help.
{¶ 23} A.R. said that she observed what looked like a bug bite on Js.H.’s leg.
They tried to figure out what happened after learning that it was broken. A.R. admitted
that one of the toddlers, E.R., was a little rough with the twins but did not think that she
would intentionally hurt them.
{¶ 24} A.R. testified that when Ja.H. was pushed off the bed, she was in the living
room and saw her mom step out of the bedroom. E.R. went into the bedroom and they
6. heard a “big thump.” They rushed in and found Ja.H. on the floor crying. They did not
observe any injuries and Ja.H. stopped crying.
{¶ 25} Redmond testified that her twins were born prematurely and spent six
weeks in the neonatal intensive care unit. They were discharged in the first week of
February 2023. Redmond stated that the twins’ received bi-weekly visits from a home
healthcare nurse the first three weeks they were home. The nurse visited the last time on
the morning of February 24, 2023.
{¶ 26} Prior to the nurse’s final visit, Redmond observed what she believed was a
bug bite on Js.H.’s left upper thigh. The nurse agreed that it looked like a bite. On
Friday, February 24, Redmond attempted to take him to the doctor but could not get an
appointment. She admitted that she lied to Js.H.’s father about taking him to urgent care.
She stated that he was “hounding” her and she and lied because she did not believe there
was anything wrong with the child. On Saturday morning, she noticed swelling in Js.H.’s
leg and took him to the hospital.
{¶ 27} Redmond testified that on one occasion her toddler, E.R., climbed into
Js.H.’s Pack-n-Play in the middle of the night and stepped on his leg.
{¶ 28} Redmond testified that she took Ja.H. to Wood County Hospital on
Monday, February 27. Redmond testified that she waited until Monday because “CPS
didn’t make it clear to me on when they wanted her to be checked out[]” and that “[t]hey
made it sound like that I could have her there by Monday morning.” She did not believe
that Ja.H. was injured.
7. {¶ 29} Nurse Melissa Ison testified that she managed the twins’ home healthcare
for approximately three to four weeks following their hospital discharge. As case
manager, her responsibilities included monitoring their weights, checking vitals and
reflexes, making sure feedings were going well, and supporting their parents.
{¶ 30} Ison testified that she examined the twins on the morning of February 24,
2023. Redmond pointed out the mark on Js.H.’s leg which Ison stated appeared to be a
pimple or lump from a bug bite. Ison stated that the leg was slightly red and swollen.
She manipulated the leg and Js.H. showed no distress. She testified that Js.H. did not
appear to need emergency care. Ison stated that Ja.H. displayed no injuries. The twins
were discharged from home healthcare that day.
{¶ 31} At the close of Redmond’s case, she renewed her Crim.R. 29 motion. The
court overruled the motion. Following deliberations, the jury acquitted Redmond of the
endangering charge relating to Js.H., but found her guilty of the endangering charge
relating to Ja.H. This appeal timely followed.
II. Assignment of Error
I. The trial Court abused its discretion in denying Ms. Redmond’s motion for a directed verdict.
III. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
{¶ 32} “The denial of a motion for acquittal under Crim.R. 29(A) ‘is governed by
the same standard as the one for determining whether a verdict is supported by sufficient
evidence.’” State v. Haynes, 2020-Ohio-1049, ¶ 24 (6th Dist.), quoting State v. Tenace,
8. 2006-Ohio-2417, ¶ 37. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, “[t]he relevant
inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the
prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime
proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (1991), paragraph
two of the syllabus; State v. Sproles, 2023-Ohio-3403, ¶ 33 (6th Dist.)
B. Sufficient Evidence Supports the Verdict.
{¶ 33} The jury found Redmond guilty of one count of child endangering, R.C.
2919.22(A), which provides: “No person, who is the parent . . . of a child under eighteen
years of age . . ., shall create a substantial risk to the health or safety of the child, by
violating a duty of care, protection, or support.”
A “substantial risk” is “a strong possibility, as contrasted with a remote or significant possibility, that a certain result may occur or that certain circumstances may exist.” R.C. 2901.01(A)(8). The state must also prove that appellant acted recklessly. See State v. McGee, 79 Ohio St.3d 193, 680 N.E.2d 975 (1997), syllabus (“The existence of the culpable mental state of recklessness is an essential element of the crime of endangering children under R.C. 2919.22(A).”)
State v. Sykes, 2022-Ohio-865, ¶ 21 (6th Dist.). Under R.C. 2901.22(C):
A person acts recklessly when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, the person disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the person’s conduct is likely to cause a certain result or is likely to be of a certain nature. A person is reckless with respect to circumstances when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, the person disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that such circumstances are likely to exist.
{¶ 34} A parent’s duty of care includes the duty to seek medical treatment for an
injured child. State v. Williams, 2024-Ohio-2438, ¶ 9 (9th Dist.), citing State v. Grad,
9. 2012-Ohio-1358, ¶ 31, 40 (9th Dist.). This duty extends to harm inflicted on a child
while in a parent’s care even if he or she did not personally cause the injury. Id., quoting
State v. Gaver, 2016-Ohio-7055, ¶ 54 (5th Dist.).
{¶ 35} Redmond claims that the evidence presented at trial failed to establish that
she recklessly created a substantial risk of harm to Ja.H. because a reasonable person
would not have known she was injured. The State counters that Redmond violated a duty
of care to Ja.H. by failing to seek immediate medical treatment (1) following Ja.H. being
thrown from the bed and (2) by ignoring the repeated requests to take her to the hospital.
{¶ 36} Reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, the court
finds that sufficient evidence supports Redmond’s child endangering conviction. At trial,
the State presented evidence that Redmond heard a loud “thud,” went into the bedroom
and saw Ja.H. on the floor crying. When asked by law enforcement, Redmond denied
having any knowledge of the cause of the injury. Redmond knew that her toddler was
jealous of and had been rough with the twins. Despite this and following Js.H.’s injury,
Redmond delayed seeking medical treatment for Ja.H. Redmond’s assignment of error is
not well-taken.
10. IV. Conclusion
{¶ 37} The judgment of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
Pursuant to App.R. 24, Redmond is ordered to pay the costs of this appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. See also 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 4.
Christine E. Mayle, J. ____________________________ JUDGE Myron C. Duhart, J. ____________________________ Charles E. Sulek, P.J. JUDGE CONCUR. ____________________________ JUDGE
This decision is subject to further editing by the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Reporter of Decisions. Parties interested in viewing the final reported version are advised to visit the Ohio Supreme Court’s web site at: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/ROD/docs/.
11.