State v. Redmond

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Redmond

291 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1218, 2009 WL 2748127

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 1, 2009

DocketED 91967

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 S.W.3d 374 (State v. Redmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Redmond, 291 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1218, 2009 WL 2748127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Collins C. Redmond (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.060 1 , and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior offender to a term of five years’ imprisonment on the assault conviction and to a term of three years’ imprisonment on the armed criminal action conviction, to be served consecutively-

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Collins C. Redmond (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.060 1 , and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior offender to a term of five years’ imprisonment on the assault conviction and to a term of three years’ imprisonment on the armed criminal action conviction, to be served consecutively-

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 S.W.3d 374, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1218, 2009 WL 2748127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-redmond-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack