State v. Redemer

198 N.W.2d 325, 188 Neb. 653, 1972 Neb. LEXIS 885
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1972
Docket38430
StatusPublished

This text of 198 N.W.2d 325 (State v. Redemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Redemer, 198 N.W.2d 325, 188 Neb. 653, 1972 Neb. LEXIS 885 (Neb. 1972).

Opinion

Newton, J.

This is a second motion filed under the Post Conviction Act on an identical ground, namely, that the sentence is excessive. The first motion was not appealed from. The judgment is final and the point raised is res judicata.

Pertinent are the rulings of this court in State v. Reichel, 187 Neb. 464, 191 N. W. 2d 826, and State v. *654 Dabney, 183 Neb. 316, 160 N. W. 2d 163. See, also, section 29-3001, R. S. Supp., 1969.

See Rule 20.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Reichel
191 N.W.2d 826 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Dabney
160 N.W.2d 163 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 N.W.2d 325, 188 Neb. 653, 1972 Neb. LEXIS 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-redemer-neb-1972.