State v. Redemer
198 N.W.2d 325, 188 Neb. 653, 1972 Neb. LEXIS 885
Opinion
This is a second motion filed under the Post Conviction Act on an identical ground, namely, that the sentence is excessive. The first motion was not appealed from. The judgment is final and the point raised is res judicata.
Pertinent are the rulings of this court in State v. Reichel, 187 Neb. 464, 191 N. W. 2d 826, and State v. *654 Dabney, 183 Neb. 316, 160 N. W. 2d 163. See, also, section 29-3001, R. S. Supp., 1969.
See Rule 20.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Redemer, 198 N.W.2d 325, 188 Neb. 653, 1972 Neb. LEXIS 885 (Neb. 1972).
198 N.W.2d 325 (State v. Redemer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Reichel
191 N.W.2d 826 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Dabney
160 N.W.2d 163 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1968)