State v. Reddog
This text of 2021 ND 180 (State v. Reddog) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 180
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Barry Ryder Reddog, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210055
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plainitff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Reddog No. 20210055
[¶1] Barry Reddog appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of robbery with a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit felonious restraint. He argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 180, 965 N.W.2d 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reddog-nd-2021.