State v. Reddick

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Reddick

199 So. 2d 99, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3903

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 24, 1967

DocketNo. 35924

StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 2d 99 (State v. Reddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reddick, 199 So. 2d 99, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3903 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 2d 99, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reddick-fla-1967.