State v. Redden

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 4, 2008
Docket2008-UP-656
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Redden (State v. Redden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Redden, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Danny Redden, Appellant.


Appeal From Cherokee County
 J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-656
Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed December 4, 2008 


AFFIRMED


Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Danny Redden was convicted of second degree burglary and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment, suspended on the service of six years, and three years’ probation.  On appeal, Redden argues the trial court erred by failing to direct a verdict in his favor because the State failed to present evidence he entered the premises without consent.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Evans v. Wabash Life Ins. Co., 247 S.C. 464, 466, 148 S.E.2d 153, 153 (1966) (finding where a defendant presents evidence after moving for a directed verdict, the motion must be renewed to preserve any error for appeal); State v. Carlson, 363 S.C. 586, 608, 611 S.E.2d 283, 294 (Ct. App. 2005) (finding appellant has the burden to provide a sufficient record for review or appeal).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Wabash Life Insurance
148 S.E.2d 153 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1966)
State v. Carlson
611 S.E.2d 283 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Redden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-redden-scctapp-2008.