State v. Reasons

1 Del. Cas. 617
CourtDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions
DecidedMay 15, 1819
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 617 (State v. Reasons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware County Court of Quarter Sessions primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Reasons, 1 Del. Cas. 617 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1819).

Opinion

Matilda Brown died about August 8th. Mary Reasons, a free Negro, came to labor in the house of deceased on [the] 11th, to clean up after her death and then, viz August 11, took the goods in question. Letters testamentary were granted to Ezekiel Hunn on the 19th. By the indictment the property was laid in Ezekiel Hunn, without mentioning his representative character; and now this point was made before the jury and discussed: whether he should not have been mentioned as executor. Here Ezekiel Hunn had never received actual possession; his was only a constructive possession. In such case executor could not maintain trover without mentioning his representative character. 4 Term, Coclcerill v. Kynaston, etc.

Court decided that property was well laid. 3 East 110,10 East 294 (case of an administrator, [Hollis et al.J v. Smith), etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reasons-paqtrsessdelawa-1819.