State v. Reardon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Reardon

853 P.2d 1372, 121 Or. App. 423, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1014

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 23, 1993·No. C91-11-35720; CA A74243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged in a five-count indictment. He pled guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, and burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215, and the state dismissed the other counts pursuant to plea negotiations. Defendant challenges the departure sentences imposed. The sentences resulted from the plea agreement, and, under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged in a five-count indictment. He pled guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, and burglary in the second degree, ORS 164.215, and the state dismissed the other counts pursuant to plea negotiations. Defendant challenges the departure sentences imposed. The sentences resulted from the plea agreement, and, under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.

State v. Reardon, 853 P.2d 1372, 121 Or. App. 423, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1014 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

853 P.2d 1372 (State v. Reardon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related