State v. Reardon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Reardon

413 S.W.3d 33, 2013 WL 5797671, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1290

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2013·No. No. WD 75703·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

James Reardon appeals from his conviction for kidnapping. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove the identity of the victim and that he kidnapped the victim for the purpose of inflicting physical injury on her. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

James Reardon appeals from his conviction for kidnapping. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove the identity of the victim and that he kidnapped the victim for the purpose of inflicting physical injury on her. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Reardon, 413 S.W.3d 33, 2013 WL 5797671, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1290 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 33 (State v. Reardon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.