State v. Reardon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Reardon

358 A.2d 699, 171 Conn. 733

DecidedJune 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 358 A.2d 699 (State v. Reardon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reardon, 358 A.2d 699, 171 Conn. 733 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered [734]*734by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before June 30, 1976.

Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, for the appel-lee (state). David 8. Golub, for the appellant (defendant). Argued June 1 decided June 1, 1976

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered [734]*734by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before June 30, 1976.

Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, for the appel-lee (state). David 8. Golub, for the appellant (defendant). Argued June 1 decided June 1, 1976

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 A.2d 699, 171 Conn. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reardon-conn-1976.