State v. Reames

257 So. 2d 695, 260 La. 1017, 1972 La. LEXIS 4810

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 24, 1972·No. No. 52189·Published

Opinion

In re: Bryan T. Reames applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order.

Writ refused. The defendant has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction and sentence.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the ruling of the trial judge is correct.

State v. Angelo, 251 La. 250, 203 So.2d 710 (1967).

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is incorrect.

See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Bryan T. Reames applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order.

Writ refused. The defendant has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction and sentence.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the ruling of the trial judge is correct.

State v. Angelo, 251 La. 250, 203 So.2d 710 (1967).

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is incorrect.

See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

State v. Reames, 257 So. 2d 695, 260 La. 1017, 1972 La. LEXIS 4810 (La. 1972).

Pincite

257 So. 2d 695 (State v. Reames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.