State v. Reames

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Reames

257 So. 2d 695, 260 La. 1017, 1972 La. LEXIS 4810

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 24, 1972

DocketNo. 52189

StatusPublished

This text of 257 So. 2d 695 (State v. Reames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reames, 257 So. 2d 695, 260 La. 1017, 1972 La. LEXIS 4810 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Bryan T. Reames applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order.

Writ refused. The defendant has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction and sentence.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the ruling of the trial judge is correct.

State v. Angelo, 251 La. 250, 203 So.2d 710 (1967).

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is incorrect.

See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI