Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Raynor

State v. Raynor

193 A.3d 49, 330 Conn. 910
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 20, 2018
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 A.3d 49 (State v. Raynor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Raynor, 193 A.3d 49, 330 Conn. 910 (Colo. 2018).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 760, 189 A.3d 652 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly denied the defendant's motion for a Porter hearing to determine the reliability of fire-arm and toolmark identification?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly denied the defendant's motion in limine to limit the scope of the testimony of the state's expert on firearm and toolmark analysis?

"3. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly admitted the uncharged misconduct evidence?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Raynor
337 Conn. 527 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 A.3d 49, 330 Conn. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-raynor-conn-2018.