State v. Raynor

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Raynor

173 A.3d 952, 327 Conn. 969

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Raynor. Read the opinion of the Court — 334 Conn. 264 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 21, 2017·Published

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 175 Conn. App. 409, 167 A.3d 1076 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record's failure to indicate the racial composition of the venire or the empaneled jury rendered the record inadequate for review of the defendant's claim under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) ?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 175 Conn. App. 409, 167 A.3d 1076 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record's failure to indicate the racial composition of the venire or the empaneled jury rendered the record inadequate for review of the defendant's claim under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) ?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Raynor, 173 A.3d 952, 327 Conn. 969 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

173 A.3d 952 (State v. Raynor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related