State v. Raymond

188 A.2d 305, 39 N.J. 241, 1963 N.J. LEXIS 222
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 18, 1963·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed defendant’s conviction for debauching a child in violation of N. J. 8. 2A:96-3. State v. Raymond, 74 N. J. Super. 434 (1962). Asserting a constitutional issue, defendant undertook to appeal to us as of right under R. R. 1:2-1(a).

The single claim on this appeal is that the trial court improperly denied a motion to adjourn the trial date. Before us the complaint is for the first time cast in constitutional garb, i. e., deprivation of the right to counsel. The attack upon the trial court’s ruling is without basis, and the effort to generate a “constitutional” question is frivolous.

The appeal is dismissed.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Raymond, 188 A.2d 305, 39 N.J. 241, 1963 N.J. LEXIS 222 (N.J. 1963).

188 A.2d 305 (State v. Raymond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hackett
764 A.2d 421 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
State v. Hackett
733 A.2d 554 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
State v. Holmes
384 A.2d 528 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
State v. White
251 A.2d 766 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
State v. Lewis
225 A.2d 582 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
State v. Dolce
188 A.2d 305 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)