State v. Raymond

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Raymond

847 So. 2d 565, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8757, 2003 WL 21344339

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 2003

DocketNo. 3D02-1711

StatusPublished

This text of 847 So. 2d 565 (State v. Raymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Raymond, 847 So. 2d 565, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8757, 2003 WL 21344339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the well-reasoned May 21, 2002, opinion of the 11th Judicial Circuit’s Appellate Division, granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court held paragraph 907.041(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2000), to be unconstitutional as a procedural rule which encroaches on the Florida Supreme Court’s exclusive rule-making authority. See Fla. Const. Art. II, § 2(a). We affirm the decision below and adopt its reasoning in all respects.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the well-reasoned May 21, 2002, opinion of the 11th Judicial Circuit’s Appellate Division, granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court held paragraph 907.041(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2000), to be unconstitutional as a procedural rule which encroaches on the Florida Supreme Court’s exclusive rule-making authority. See Fla. Const. Art. II, § 2(a). We affirm the decision below and adopt its reasoning in all respects.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 So. 2d 565, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8757, 2003 WL 21344339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-raymond-fladistctapp-2003.