State v. Raygosa

340 Or. App. 419
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 7, 2025
DocketA181953
StatusUnpublished

This text of 340 Or. App. 419 (State v. Raygosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Raygosa, 340 Or. App. 419 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

No. 420 May 7, 2025 419

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOE ALBERT RAYGOSA, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 18CR10987; A181953

Charles M. Zennaché, Judge. Submitted April 3, 2025. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and David O. Ferry, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Kirsten M. Naito, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, Kamins, Judge, and Jacquot, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Parker, 259 Or App 547, 314 P3d 980 (2013), rev den, 355 Or 380 (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Parker
314 P.3d 980 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 Or. App. 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-raygosa-orctapp-2025.