State v. Rayford
This text of 533 So. 2d 353 (State v. Rayford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Rayford, Terence P.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 321813.
Denied on the showing made. Under the provisions of La.C.Cr.P. art. 914.1 an appellant may seek transcription of only those portions of proceedings necessary in light of assignments of errors urged. That article further provides that transcripts of any portion of proceedings not related to anticipated assignments of errors shall not be furnished. Relator may seek to “check out” a copy of the appeal record for use in filing a supplemental pro se brief. He may petition the court of appeal for supplementation of the record if the record does not contain any portion of the proceedings as to which an assignment of errors is anticipated. Any such petition for supplementation should contain relator’s certification that there are good grounds for the supplementation request in light of the assignment of errors to be urged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
533 So. 2d 353, 1988 La. LEXIS 2401, 1988 WL 126775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rayford-la-1988.