State v. . Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Ray

127 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 840, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 425

DecidedMay 20, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 927 (State v. . Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Ray, 127 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 840, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 425 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant has appealed from a sentence confining him for a period of twelve months in the common jail of Buncombe County and assigning him to work on the roads of Buncombe County without stripes.

The case was fairly and properly tried. The charge of the learned and careful judge who tried the case below was full and fair. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The exceptions are without merit.

"We can find in the trial

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant has appealed from a sentence confining him for a period of twelve months in the common jail of Buncombe County and assigning him to work on the roads of Buncombe County without stripes.

The case was fairly and properly tried. The charge of the learned and careful judge who tried the case below was full and fair. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. The exceptions are without merit.

"We can find in the trial

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.E. 927, 189 N.C. 840, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ray-nc-1925.