State v. Ray

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ray

568 S.W.3d 89

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 2019

DocketNo. ED 105957

StatusPublished

This text of 568 S.W.3d 89 (State v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ray, 568 S.W.3d 89 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Ray appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon its finding following a court trial convicting him of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and one count of furnishing pornographic materials to a minor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Ray appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon its finding following a court trial convicting him of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and one count of furnishing pornographic materials to a minor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 S.W.3d 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ray-moctapp-2019.