State v. Ray

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ray

463 S.W.3d 465, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, 2015 WL 3610315

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2015·No. ED 101193·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Ray appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Ray appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

State v. Ray, 463 S.W.3d 465, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, 2015 WL 3610315 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

463 S.W.3d 465 (State v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.