State v. Ray
354 S.W.3d 256, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649, 2011 WL 6209374
Opinion
ORDER
Tina Ray appeals the judgment entered upon a trial court’s verdict convicting her of one count of tampering with physical evidence, a class D felony. We find the trial court did not err in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal for insufficiency of the evidence.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, *257 provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ray, 354 S.W.3d 256, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649, 2011 WL 6209374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
354 S.W.3d 256 (State v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
354 S.W.3d 256 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)