State v. Ray

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Ray

37 Mo. 365

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided February 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an indictment under the 39th section of the “Act concerning crimes and punishments.” On motion of the defendant, the indictment was quashed. The indictment charges all the facts necessary to constitute the offence, under said section. (Conrad v. State, 11 Mo. 579; Jennings v. State, 9 Mo. 862.) The motion should have been overruled.

Judgment reversed, and the case remanded.

Judge Wagner concurs ; Judge Lovelace absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an indictment under the 39th section of the “Act concerning crimes and punishments.” On motion of the defendant, the indictment was quashed. The indictment charges all the facts necessary to constitute the offence, under said section. (Conrad v. State, 11 Mo. 579; Jennings v. State, 9 Mo. 862.) The motion should have been overruled.

Judgment reversed, and the case remanded.

Judge Wagner concurs ; Judge Lovelace absent.

State v. Ray, 37 Mo. 365 (Mo. 1866).

Pincite

37 Mo. 365 (State v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related