State v. Ray

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Ray

37 Mo. 365

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedFebruary 15, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 Mo. 365 (State v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ray, 37 Mo. 365 (Mo. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an indictment under the 39th section of the “Act concerning crimes and punishments.” On motion of the defendant, the indictment was quashed. The indictment charges all the facts necessary to constitute the offence, under said section. (Conrad v. State, 11 Mo. 579; Jennings v. State, 9 Mo. 862.) The motion should have been overruled.

Judgment reversed, and the case remanded.

Judge Wagner concurs ; Judge Lovelace absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an indictment under the 39th section of the “Act concerning crimes and punishments.” On motion of the defendant, the indictment was quashed. The indictment charges all the facts necessary to constitute the offence, under said section. (Conrad v. State, 11 Mo. 579; Jennings v. State, 9 Mo. 862.) The motion should have been overruled.

Judgment reversed, and the case remanded.

Judge Wagner concurs ; Judge Lovelace absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Mo. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ray-mo-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack