State v. Ray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Ray

513 So. 2d 762, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2398, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12275

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Ray. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1334 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 1987·No. Nos. 86-2209, 86-2210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of the information against defendant. The dismissal was on the basis of the state having untimely provided discovery information to defendant. We reverse.

No prejudice to defendant is shown by the record to have resulted. See State v. Peragine, 465 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. Banks, 418 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

No motion for discharge on speedy trial grounds having been filed, we do not address that aspect.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of the information against defendant. The dismissal was on the basis of the state having untimely provided discovery information to defendant. We reverse.

No prejudice to defendant is shown by the record to have resulted. See State v. Peragine, 465 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. Banks, 418 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

No motion for discharge on speedy trial grounds having been filed, we do not address that aspect.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

State v. Ray, 513 So. 2d 762, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2398, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

513 So. 2d 762 (State v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related