State v. Ray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Ray

513 So. 2d 762, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2398, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12275

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 7, 1987

DocketNos. 86-2209, 86-2210

StatusPublished

This text of 513 So. 2d 762 (State v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ray, 513 So. 2d 762, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2398, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of the information against defendant. The dismissal was on the basis of the state having untimely provided discovery information to defendant. We reverse.

No prejudice to defendant is shown by the record to have resulted. See State v. Peragine, 465 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. Banks, 418 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

No motion for discharge on speedy trial grounds having been filed, we do not address that aspect.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI