State v. Rawlings

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Rawlings

304 N.E.2d 898, 36 Ohio St. 2d 137, 65 Ohio Op. 2d 337, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 292

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 12, 1973

DocketNo. 73-396

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 304 N.E.2d 898 (State v. Rawlings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rawlings, 304 N.E.2d 898, 36 Ohio St. 2d 137, 65 Ohio Op. 2d 337, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 292 (Ohio 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Subsequent to the February 2, 1973, judgment of the Court of Appeals, but prior to that court’s April 13,1973, certification as a conflict case, R. C. 2967.191 [138]*138was amended, effective, March 23, 1973. That statute, as amended, requires that “the adult parole authority shall reduce the minimum and maximum sentence of a prisoner by the total number of days the prisoner was confined for any reason arising out of the offense for which he was convicted and sentenced.”

Appellee has advised this court that a certificate by the Montgomery County sheriff, dated June 12, 1973, has been furnished the Adult Parole Authority, setting forth the 198-day confinement credit to which he is entitled under amended R. C. 2967.191.

The issue of appellee’s right to pre-sentence credit for jail time served, arising out of the offense for which he was convicted and sentenced, is therefore moot on authority of State v. Solis (April 11, 1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 13. Although Solis was decided two days prior to the certification of this case by the Court of Appeals, that decision was not generally available until the April 23, 1973, issue of the Ohio Bar.

The statutory change mandating that pre-sentence jail time credit be given by the Adult Parole Authority, in effect, also moots the issue respecting a conflict with the Summers case, as well as the later case of State v. Little (May 10, 1973), 34 Ohio App. 2d 121, whose holding paralleled Summers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Subsequent to the February 2, 1973, judgment of the Court of Appeals, but prior to that court’s April 13,1973, certification as a conflict case, R. C. 2967.191 [138]*138was amended, effective, March 23, 1973. That statute, as amended, requires that “the adult parole authority shall reduce the minimum and maximum sentence of a prisoner by the total number of days the prisoner was confined for any reason arising out of the offense for which he was convicted and sentenced.”

Appellee has advised this court that a certificate by the Montgomery County sheriff, dated June 12, 1973, has been furnished the Adult Parole Authority, setting forth the 198-day confinement credit to which he is entitled under amended R. C. 2967.191.

The issue of appellee’s right to pre-sentence credit for jail time served, arising out of the offense for which he was convicted and sentenced, is therefore moot on authority of State v. Solis (April 11, 1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 13. Although Solis was decided two days prior to the certification of this case by the Court of Appeals, that decision was not generally available until the April 23, 1973, issue of the Ohio Bar.

The statutory change mandating that pre-sentence jail time credit be given by the Adult Parole Authority, in effect, also moots the issue respecting a conflict with the Summers case, as well as the later case of State v. Little (May 10, 1973), 34 Ohio App. 2d 121, whose holding paralleled Summers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 N.E.2d 898, 36 Ohio St. 2d 137, 65 Ohio Op. 2d 337, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rawlings-ohio-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack