State v. Rault
This text of 483 So. 2d 141 (State v. Rault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
concurring.
I disagree in part with the principal opinion’s treatment of assignment No. 2. In State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545 (La.1982) the improper prosecutorial remark relating to defendant’s reputation was not addressed to a character witness and Parker had not placed his character at issue. Therefore, the Parker ruling, that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial as the result of the improper question because the witness failed to answer, is inapposite to an analysis of whether the State v. Johnson, 389 So.2d 372 (La.1980) criteria regulating questioning of character witnesses on prior acts of misconduct by defendants have been met.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 So. 2d 141, 1986 La. LEXIS 8168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rault-la-1986.