State v. Ratteray
This text of 2013 ND 162 (State v. Ratteray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 9/25/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 162
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Christopher Ashley Ratteray, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
No. 20120446
Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John T. Paulson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lee M. Grossman, State’s Attorney, 230 Fourth Street NW, Room 301, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for plaintiff and appellee.
Thomas M. Jackson, 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Ratteray
[¶1] Christopher Ratteray appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition and one count of creation of sexually expressive images. Ratteray argues there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions. He also claims his sentence is excessive and was based on impermissible factors. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ratteray-nd-2013.