State v. Ratliff

82 P. 1135, 72 Kan. 701, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 409
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided November 11, 1905·No. No. 14,446; No. 14,504; No. 14,503; No. 14,513·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In each of the above-entitled cases the record shows that more than thirty days elapsed after the service of notice of appeal before the filing of a transcript in this court. (The State v. Teissedre, 30 Kan. 476, 2 Pac. 650; The State v. Caton, 71 Kan. 855, 80 Pac. 938.)

Each of the cases is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ratliff, 82 P. 1135, 72 Kan. 701, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 409 (kan 1905).

82 P. 1135 (State v. Ratliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Teissedre
30 Kan. 476 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1883)
State v. Caton
80 P. 938 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1905)