State v. Rasmussen
311 S.W.3d 372, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 528, 2010 WL 1655814
Opinion
ORDER
Kenneth Rasmussen challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for driving while intoxicated as an aggravated offender. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rasmussen, 311 S.W.3d 372, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 528, 2010 WL 1655814 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
311 S.W.3d 372 (State v. Rasmussen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.