State v. Raphael

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Raphael

2017 ND 131, 895 N.W.2d 314, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 143, 2017 WL 2461923

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 2017

Docket20160447

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 131 (State v. Raphael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Raphael, 2017 ND 131, 895 N.W.2d 314, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 143, 2017 WL 2461923 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Roxanne Raphael appeals a district court judgment after a jury convicted her of possession of a controlled substance. Raphael argues the jury’s verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Roxanne Raphael appeals a district court judgment after a jury convicted her of possession of a controlled substance. Raphael argues the jury’s verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 131, 895 N.W.2d 314, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 143, 2017 WL 2461923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-raphael-nd-2017.