State v. Rankin

368 N.C. 278

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 21, 2015·No. 040P15-3·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Appointment of Counsel

1. Dismissed as moot

2. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

2. Allowed

3. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Notice of Appeal

3. Dismissed ex mero motu

4. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

4. Dismissed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rankin, 368 N.C. 278 (N.C. 2015).

Pincite

368 N.C. 278 (State v. Rankin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.