State v. Raney
This text of 107 N.W. 1134 (State v. Raney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant w,as convicted of stopping a train of cars, of which he was in charge as conductor, upon and across a street in the city of Mankato, and holding the same there for more than ten minutes, in violation of the statutes, ■and appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
A careful examination of the evidence leads to the conclusion that the evidence sustains the verdict, and that defendant’s theory of the case, viz., that the obstruction of the street was occasioned by an accident to the train, the breaking of a coupling, and unavoidable, was submitted to the jury under proper instructions. We discover no error sufficient to justify- a reversal.
Order affirmed. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 N.W. 1134, 98 Minn. 537, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-raney-minn-1906.