State v. Randklev
This text of 164 P.3d 307 (State v. Randklev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, assault in the first degree, ORS 163.185, felony assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, and attempted rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375. He argues that, by imposing an 18-month sentence with respect to his conviction for felony assault in the fourth degree, the trial court exceeded the maximum allowable sentence provided by law. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 P.3d 307, 214 Or. App. 199, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-randklev-orctapp-2007.