State v. Randklev

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Randklev

164 P.3d 307, 214 Or. App. 199, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1004

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 18, 2007·No. 03C50551; A128411·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, assault in the first degree, ORS 163.185, felony assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, and attempted rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375. He argues that, by imposing an 18-month sentence with respect to his conviction for felony assault in the fourth degree, the trial court exceeded the maximum allowable sentence provided by law. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, assault in the first degree, ORS 163.185, felony assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, and attempted rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375. He argues that, by imposing an 18-month sentence with respect to his conviction for felony assault in the fourth degree, the trial court exceeded the maximum allowable sentence provided by law. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

State v. Randklev, 164 P.3d 307, 214 Or. App. 199, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1004 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

164 P.3d 307 (State v. Randklev) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related