State v. Rance

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Rance

691 N.E.2d 1060, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 910

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 1, 1998

Docket98-2

StatusPublished

This text of 691 N.E.2d 1060 (State v. Rance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rance, 691 N.E.2d 1060, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 910 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-96-277. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue found at page 7 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry decided December 5, 1997:

“ * * * Finding our decision to be in conflict with decisions of the First, Third and Tenth District Courts of Appeals, we hereby certify the record of this matter to the Supreme Court of Ohio to determine whether the Double Jeopardy Clause[s] of the United States and Ohio Constitutions and R.C. 2941.25 prevent a court from imposing sentences for violations of both the involuntary manslaughter and aggravated robbery statutes.”

The conflict cases are State v. Thomas (Dec. 31, 1990), Logan App. No. 8-88-20, unreported, 1990 WL 262265; State v. Watson (Sept. 28, 1988), Hamilton App. No. C-870554, unreported, 1988 WL 101214; and State v. Crabtree (Dec. 1, 1987), Franklin App. No. 87AP-321, unreported, 1987 WL 26313.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-96-277. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue found at page 7 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry decided December 5, 1997:

“ * * * Finding our decision to be in conflict with decisions of the First, Third and Tenth District Courts of Appeals, we hereby certify the record of this matter to the Supreme Court of Ohio to determine whether the Double Jeopardy Clause[s] of the United States and Ohio Constitutions and R.C. 2941.25 prevent a court from imposing sentences for violations of both the involuntary manslaughter and aggravated robbery statutes.”

The conflict cases are State v. Thomas (Dec. 31, 1990), Logan App. No. 8-88-20, unreported, 1990 WL 262265; State v. Watson (Sept. 28, 1988), Hamilton App. No. C-870554, unreported, 1988 WL 101214; and State v. Crabtree (Dec. 1, 1987), Franklin App. No. 87AP-321, unreported, 1987 WL 26313.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 N.E.2d 1060, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rance-ohio-1998.