State v. Ramsey

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Ramsey

127 P. 691, 63 Or. 291, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 231

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided November 12, 1912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, C. A. Ramsey, was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor in Crook County in violation of the local option law, and he appeals from the judgment rendered against him. All the questions presented for review have been determined adversely to the contention of the defendant herein in the case of [292]*292State v. Billups, 68 Or. 277 (127 Pac. 686), and the conclusion there reached is controlling herein.

It follows that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, C. A. Ramsey, was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor in Crook County in violation of the local option law, and he appeals from the judgment rendered against him. All the questions presented for review have been determined adversely to the contention of the defendant herein in the case of [292]*292State v. Billups, 68 Or. 277 (127 Pac. 686), and the conclusion there reached is controlling herein.

It follows that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.

State v. Ramsey, 127 P. 691, 63 Or. 291, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 231 (Or. 1912).

Pincite

127 P. 691 (State v. Ramsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related