State v. Ramsey

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Ramsey

127 P. 691, 63 Or. 291, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 231

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 12, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 P. 691 (State v. Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ramsey, 127 P. 691, 63 Or. 291, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 231 (Or. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, C. A. Ramsey, was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor in Crook County in violation of the local option law, and he appeals from the judgment rendered against him. All the questions presented for review have been determined adversely to the contention of the defendant herein in the case of [292]*292State v. Billups, 68 Or. 277 (127 Pac. 686), and the conclusion there reached is controlling herein.

It follows that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, C. A. Ramsey, was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor in Crook County in violation of the local option law, and he appeals from the judgment rendered against him. All the questions presented for review have been determined adversely to the contention of the defendant herein in the case of [292]*292State v. Billups, 68 Or. 277 (127 Pac. 686), and the conclusion there reached is controlling herein.

It follows that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 P. 691, 63 Or. 291, 1912 Ore. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ramsey-or-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack