State v. Ramsey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

State v. Ramsey

1921 OK CR 216, 201 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 129, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 161

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 15, 1921

DocketNo. A-3262.

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 216 (State v. Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ramsey, 1921 OK CR 216, 201 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 129, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 161 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

*130 BESSEY, J.

A. L. Ramsey and A. T. Smith were, by information filed in the district court of Washington county on January 9, 1918, charged with Sabbath breaking by conducting a moving picture show on Sunday. The defendants filed a demurrer to said information, on the ground that the allegations in such information did not state a public offense against the laws of the state of Oklahoma. This demurrer was-by the court sustained, and the state appeals. The question here involved is identical to that in the case of State v. Clint Smith, 19 Okla. Cr. 184,198 Pac. 879, and for the reasons stated therein the ruling of the trial court, sustaining defendant’s demurrer, is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs. MATSON, J., disqualified, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*130 BESSEY, J.

A. L. Ramsey and A. T. Smith were, by information filed in the district court of Washington county on January 9, 1918, charged with Sabbath breaking by conducting a moving picture show on Sunday. The defendants filed a demurrer to said information, on the ground that the allegations in such information did not state a public offense against the laws of the state of Oklahoma. This demurrer was-by the court sustained, and the state appeals. The question here involved is identical to that in the case of State v. Clint Smith, 19 Okla. Cr. 184,198 Pac. 879, and for the reasons stated therein the ruling of the trial court, sustaining defendant’s demurrer, is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs. MATSON, J., disqualified, and not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK CR 216, 201 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 129, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ramsey-oklacrimapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack