State v. Ramsey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ramsey

474 S.W.3d 607, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1195, 2015 WL 7252418

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 2015

DocketWD 78081

StatusPublished

This text of 474 S.W.3d 607 (State v. Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ramsey, 474 S.W.3d 607, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1195, 2015 WL 7252418 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cody Ramsey appeals his conviction of the Class A misdemeanor of possession of under 35 grams of marijuana in violation of § 195.202, RSMo. Ramsey argues that there was insufficient evidence to prove that he constructively possessed the drugs in question. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cody Ramsey appeals his conviction of the Class A misdemeanor of possession of under 35 grams of marijuana in violation of § 195.202, RSMo. Ramsey argues that there was insufficient evidence to prove that he constructively possessed the drugs in question. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 S.W.3d 607, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1195, 2015 WL 7252418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ramsey-moctapp-2015.