State v. Ramsey

76 Mo. 398
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Hough, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of willfully and unlawfully obstructing a public road .in Washington county, and has appealed to this court, but no brief has been filed on his behalf. It appears from the record that the order of the county court establishing the road charged to have been obstructed by the defendant, was introduced in evidence, and that there was testimony tending to show that the same had been used as a public road, and that the defendant had built a fence across it. This testimony is sufficient to support a conviction. R. S., § 6964. The instructions given fairly presented the case to the jury, and we see no reason for disturbing the judgment. The judgment will be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ramsey, 76 Mo. 398 (Mo. 1882).

76 Mo. 398 (State v. Ramsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Transue
111 S.W. 523 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Jasper v. McNeley
56 Mo. App. 556 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
State v. Parsons
53 Mo. App. 135 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
State v. Warner
51 Mo. App. 174 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
State v. Rhodes
35 Mo. App. 360 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Howard v. State
47 Ark. 431 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)