State v. Ramos

629 So. 2d 103, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1942, 1993 WL 517387
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1993
DocketNo. 81042
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 629 So. 2d 103 (State v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ramos, 629 So. 2d 103, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1942, 1993 WL 517387 (Fla. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Ramos, 608 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

That portion of the district court’s decision that affirmed the trial court’s order dismissing the charges against Lazaro Diaz is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). The case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ramos
632 So. 2d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Coleman v. Coleman
629 So. 2d 103 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
629 So. 2d 103, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1942, 1993 WL 517387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ramos-fla-1993.