State v. Ramos

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Ramos

629 So. 2d 103, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1942, 1993 WL 517387

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 16, 1993·No. No. 81042·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Ramos, 608 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

That portion of the district court’s decision that affirmed the trial court’s order dismissing the charges against Lazaro Diaz is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). The case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Ramos, 608 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

That portion of the district court’s decision that affirmed the trial court’s order dismissing the charges against Lazaro Diaz is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). The case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

State v. Ramos, 629 So. 2d 103, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 642, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1942, 1993 WL 517387 (Fla. 1993).

Pincite

629 So. 2d 103 (State v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related