Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Ramirez

State v. Ramirez

737 P.2d 976, 86 Or. App. 5, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3953
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 17, 1987
DocketC86-07-33189; CA A42098
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 737 P.2d 976 (State v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ramirez, 737 P.2d 976, 86 Or. App. 5, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3953 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted after trial to the court on the crimes of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree. The court imposed separate sentences for each conviction and ordered that they be served consecutively. Defendant argues that the court erred in not stating reasons for imposing consecutive sentences, as required by ORS 137.122. The state concedes that the court erred, and we agree.

Defendant also contends that the sentences imposed were excessive. Because we remand for resentencing, that issue need not be decided.

Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Crawford
750 P.2d 537 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 P.2d 976, 86 Or. App. 5, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 3953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ramirez-orctapp-1987.