State v. Rama
707 A.2d 999, 153 N.J. 162, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 210
This text of 707 A.2d 999 (State v. Rama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Rama, 707 A.2d 999, 153 N.J. 162, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1998).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 298 N.J.Super. 339, 689 A.2d 776 (1997).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Barasch
858 A.2d 1134 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
State ex rel. N.L.
783 A.2d 260 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
State v. Eisenman
710 A.2d 441 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
707 A.2d 999, 153 N.J. 162, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rama-nj-1998.