State v. Rama
707 A.2d 999, 153 N.J. 162, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 210
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 298 N.J.Super. 339, 689 A.2d 776 (1997).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rama, 707 A.2d 999, 153 N.J. 162, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1998).
707 A.2d 999 (State v. Rama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Barasch
858 A.2d 1134 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
State ex rel. N.L.
783 A.2d 260 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
State v. Eisenman
710 A.2d 441 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)